SIN CITY cost forty-million bucks and made a nice pile of green for an R-rated pic. Creators Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller managed to spend $25 million more on this one and couldn't even make back their budget. A DAME TO KILL FOR is mostly empty and uninspired--not worth killing for at all and trying to thrill on autopilot on her last call after a long night. The pieces are all there--tough guys, beautiful dames, grifters, grafters, mugs, pugs, thugs, gore, cynicism and darkness--but it's all just style without much of the fun. Few sparks. Nothing holding it all together. The extra dough (for a lot shorter show) seems to have bought a lot more computer graphics than the original had but little else. The near-decade of technological advances between them sure as hell isn't apparent--everything looks way cheaper than it did before. Mickey Rourke's Franken-Marv makeup is slapped-on and crude this time around and not in any good way. Jessica Alba is still playing what's supposed to be the hottest number in town as a stripper who makes it a point to never strip. There are no less than three assaults on the heavily armed compounds of rich assholes, two featuring Marv and two as the climactic setpieces of two of the film's three longer stories. The graphics are on overload, to the point of becoming quite overbearing. Badly CGI'd cars go up CGI'd winding roads over and over again. Bodies and parts of them fly through the ether. While the violence in the original was gleefully profuse and over-the-top, it always had a point; here, it's even more over the top but the glee is most definitely gone, and a lot of it--maybe even most--is just gratuitous. There for its own sake. And even with all its blood and thunder, A DAME TO KILL FOR manages to be pretty damn dull. Not boring, just mostly uninteresting. Quite a trick.
 |
| Eva Green one-sheet banned by the MPAA. |
It ain't all bad though. A lot of what I've just been bitching about gets in the way of what are, at heart, some pretty good stories. "Just Another Saturday Night" is a throwaway piece that doesn't really go anywhere, and "Nancy's Last Dance" is pretty forgettable--more like a highlight reel of a bunch of stuff we've already seen--but "The Long, Bad Night," about a gambler who earns immortality by showing up the most powerful man in Basin City, is a keeper, and the title story "A Dame To Kill For" is definitely the highlight. Its pacing often sucks--the style fucking up the substance--and all the other shit weighs it down but it has a killer cast--as does the entire picture--and most importantly, it has Eva Green. Manute, her maniacal, superhuman manservant, describes her character (Ava) as a goddess who enslaves men to her will. Robert Rodriguez reportedly wanted Angelina Jolie to play the part and she was the obvious model for the comic original but for whatever reason that didn't work out, which is just as well. When it comes to goddesses who could enslave men to her will, Eva Green will do just fine. Gotta' fess up, I'm a big fan, and of all the Sin City comic tales, "A Dame To Kill For" is probably my favorite. The screen version doesn't live up to it and yeah, that's disappointing after how well the first film's adaptations were handled, but it's far from terrible.
For that matter, the movie isn't really terrible. A lot of critics burned it all to hell like it was something personal with them. Maybe with some of them it was--they didn't like the first one and it was great and made a pile of dough anyway, so they doubled down on this one. Can't say it doesn't earn some abuse. It should have been a lot better. As it is, it's, Eva excepted, depressingly middling. An overpriced monument to the declining powers of its creators. Not a complete failure but no getting around it, it was the Big Fat Disappointment.
--j.
I just commented in TJ's too. I dig like this one quite a bit, but I understand why some wouldn't. Great review regardless of differing opinion.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I try.
DeleteI was kind of lukewarm to it. I didn't dislike it and could perhaps see this in my dvd collection in the future. Eva Green quite frankly has a lot to do with that; J G-L and Powers' story also was quite a highlight, I also thought. I wish Alba would just keep herself out of movies like these because she just doesn't have the same willingness to go all the way as Green does.
ReplyDeleteAlba seems to be there as one of Rodriguez's regular troupe. He likes to work with a gang of regulars and that's fine, but she shouldn't be cast in a part like that. It was really weird in the first movie and it's even more weird in this one.
DeleteEva is definitely the high point of this one. I've been a fan since THE DREAMERS and knew she'd be a winner in that part as soon as I heard she'd been cast. She's a remarkable screen presence and often seems to end up the bright spot in otherwise lesser films. She was the only thing of note in KINGDOM OF HEAVEN, a wretched turd of a movie; its creators displayed the same judgment as they had in the rest of the film by eliminating most of her part from the theatrical release (you have to find the director's cut to see it). She was the high point of CAMELOT (though it had a few other items of interest). I saw her in the sequel to 300 a few months ago. It was terrible but she had a great part and was great in it. I'd definitely like to see her in more of these great parts that were in great movies for a change.
I have the first season of that series on Showtime I still haven't watched yet. I hear she is good in that as well.
ReplyDeleteCAMELOT is, for the most part, a really terrible show, but you can see seeds of what could have been great throughout it. Eva is great in it. It was never going to overcome Jamie Campbell Bower as Arthur though--it was pretty much doomed from the moment that call was made.
DeleteYour favorite show walking dead finally accepted its fate and became a soap opera this week set in suburbia and you didnt even write about it!
ReplyDelete