When,
in the '40s, Universal's long-running horror franchises entered their
decadent period, the studio sought to boost sagging box-office returns
by allowing their various creepy critters to cross over into one
another's movies. The resulting monster mashes earn most of the abuse
heaped on them over the years but their place in cinematic history is
a bit more significant than merely signaling the creative decline that
eventually sent Universal's once-mighty monsters down the path to the
Abbot-and-Costello atrocities. Among other things, a childhood screening
of FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLF MAN eventually gave birth to the entire
cinematic career of Spanish horrormeister Paul Naschy. And in 1972 and
'73, Spanish fantasist Jesús Franco undertook a trilogy of
monster-mashes featuring the classic creeps, one of which has, of late,
occupied enough space in my head to become my present subject.
I'm
not, I'll confess, particularly fond of DRACULA, PRISONER OF
FRANKENSTEIN, the first of these efforts. Its best idea was Howard
Vernon's portrayal of Dracula as a literal living corpse. Sits around
silently, unmoving and looking stiff, pasty and dead until suddenly
exploding when prodded to action. It's a great image in an otherwise
stiff and unmoving film. The second of this run, though, is a different
story entirely. Like many Francos, THE EROTIC RITES OF
FRANKENSTEIN--have to love that title, right?--is both an impoverished
production and a magnificent little gem of a movie, another example of
how Franco could, in his prime, make something great out of practically
nothing. The evil immortal Cagliostro murders Frankenstein and steals
his monster as part of a plot to use it to cross-breed an army of
mutants that will con-kuh duh vorld. Can Frankenstein's daughter stop
this evil plan? You know you want it.
Whereas
Franco's countryman Naschy always admired the old Universals
and employed an almost classical approach when adapting them, Franco's
attitude is a sort of irreverent reverence, extending to them as much
respect as they deserve while using them as a canvas to play out his own
wild and unique fantasies. The Universal monster mashes are deeply
embedded in the picture's DNA--Franco even tips his hat to their
temporal ambiguities--but Franco's relentless
idiosyncrasies indelibly mark this picture as his own. Among other
things, his movie features a hulking brute of a Frankenstein's monster with silver
skin, a screeching, naked, blind bird-woman who eats flesh and more
shrouded mutants than you can shake a stick at. Bizarre camera angles, a
focus on fetishistic fixations, a dreamlike narrative, a great,
stifling horror-movie atmosphere--it's pure Franco gold.
THE
EROTIC RITES OF FRANKENSTEIN exists in multiple versions. Some years
ago, Image offered a DVD of the Spanish version, from which all the sexy
bits had to be either removed or replaced with alternate "clothed"
scenes in order to comply with the censorship of the fascist era. Even
the "erotic" was stripped from the title. Still a great movie, to be
sure, but definitely compromised by the changes. This version's one
solid addition was a subplot involving Lina Romay as a gypsy girl. This
was Lina's first work with the director. She would, of course, spend the
rest of her life as Franco's companion, assistant and muse. Various
writers have portrayed her scenes--sometimes inaccurately reported as
being only a single scene--as entirely extraneous, which is a
misrepresentation. When watching the Spanish cut, it's true her moments
do seem at first to come out of nowhere but when, toward the end, their
point is made clear, it gives the ending a much harder punch. The French
version of the film, which Redemption released in 2012, restores all
the material shed by the Spanish but it omits the Romay subplot and the
ending isn't as strong for it. Still, unless and until a Dr.
Franco-stein turns up to stitch these versions together, the French is
definitely the preferred cut of the film. And any version of THE EROTIC
(or non-erotic) RITES OF FRANKENSTEIN is worth one's time.
--j.